DATA
Market Cap:$2.87Tβ–² 1.8%24h Vol:$142.0BBTC Dom.:54.2%ETH Dom.:17.4%Cryptos:14,837Live Charts β†’
PRICES
BTC$87,420β–² 2.40%ETH$3,891β–² 1.80%SOL$184β–Ό 0.90%BNB$612β–² 0.50%XRP$0.9800β–² 3.20%ADA$0.7400β–Ό 1.10%AVAX$38.40β–² 1.60%DOT$9.82β–Ό 0.40%LINK$17.20β–² 2.10%MATIC$0.6100β–Ό 2.30%BTC$87,420β–² 2.40%ETH$3,891β–² 1.80%SOL$184β–Ό 0.90%BNB$612β–² 0.50%XRP$0.9800β–² 3.20%ADA$0.7400β–Ό 1.10%AVAX$38.40β–² 1.60%DOT$9.82β–Ό 0.40%LINK$17.20β–² 2.10%MATIC$0.6100β–Ό 2.30%
As featured in
ForbesCoinDeskDecryptCoinTelegraphThe BlockBankless
0Β readers online now

Rating Methodology

At CryptoDegen, we believe in complete transparency about how we evaluate and rate crypto products. This page explains our methodology for each product category.

Our Rating Scale

We use a 5-star rating scale with 0.1 increments. Each product is scored across multiple weighted criteria specific to its category. The final rating is a weighted average of all criteria scores.

  • 5.0: Exceptional β€” Best-in-class across virtually all criteria
  • 4.0-4.9: Excellent β€” Strong performance with minor areas for improvement
  • 3.0-3.9: Good β€” Solid option with some notable limitations
  • 2.0-2.9: Fair β€” Significant areas for improvement
  • 1.0-1.9: Poor β€” Major concerns in multiple areas

Crypto Exchange Ratings

We evaluate crypto exchanges on these weighted criteria:

  • Security (25%) β€” Track record, insurance, audits, proof of reserves, 2FA, cold storage practices
  • Fees (20%) β€” Trading fees, withdrawal fees, deposit fees, spread, fee tier structure
  • Coin Selection (15%) β€” Number and quality of supported assets, trading pairs
  • User Experience (15%) β€” UI/UX design, mobile app quality, onboarding process
  • Features (10%) β€” Staking, earn programs, advanced trading tools, API access
  • Customer Support (10%) β€” Response time, available channels, knowledge base quality
  • Regulatory Compliance (5%) β€” Licenses held, KYC/AML compliance, geographic availability

Crypto Wallet Ratings

We evaluate crypto wallets on these weighted criteria:

  • Security (30%) β€” Open-source code, security audits, track record, encryption, key management
  • Supported Assets (20%) β€” Blockchain networks and tokens supported
  • User Experience (20%) β€” Setup ease, daily usage, backup/recovery process
  • Features (15%) β€” DApp browser, in-wallet swaps, staking, NFT support
  • Privacy (10%) β€” Data collection policies, KYC requirements, tracking
  • Price (5%) β€” Hardware cost or premium features pricing

DeFi Protocol Ratings

We evaluate DeFi protocols on these weighted criteria:

  • Security & Audits (30%) β€” Audit history, bug bounty programs, incident track record
  • Yield/Rates (20%) β€” Competitive APY/APR, rate stability
  • TVL & Liquidity (15%) β€” Total value locked, market depth, slippage
  • User Experience (15%) β€” Interface quality, documentation, onboarding
  • Governance (10%) β€” Decentralization level, community involvement, DAO structure
  • Chain Support (10%) β€” Multi-chain availability, bridge partnerships

Tax Software Ratings

  • Exchange Integrations (25%) β€” Number of supported exchanges, wallets, DeFi protocols
  • Accuracy (25%) β€” Calculation accuracy, DeFi/NFT handling, edge case support
  • User Experience (20%) β€” Ease of use, import process, report generation
  • Price (15%) β€” Pricing tiers, value for money, free tier limitations
  • Tax Form Support (10%) β€” Countries supported, form types, accountant access
  • Customer Support (5%) β€” Response time, documentation, community

How We Keep Ratings Current

Crypto products evolve rapidly. We review and update our ratings on a regular schedule:

  • Monthly: Best-of roundup pages are refreshed with latest pricing and features
  • Quarterly: Individual product reviews undergo comprehensive re-evaluation
  • As Needed: Major product changes, security incidents, or significant fee updates trigger immediate review

Editorial Independence

Our rating methodology is applied consistently regardless of whether we have a commercial relationship with the product. Advertisers cannot pay for higher ratings, and our editorial team operates independently from our business development team. If a product scores well in our methodology, it earns a high rating β€” period.